Calling Visa for Israeli Citizens: A Test of Indonesia's Consistency on Constitution and Humanitarian Ethics

The issuance of a calling visa for 51 Israeli citizens by the Indonesian government has sparked wide debate. This decision not only has economic implications but also touches on the fundamental principles of the Indonesian Constitution and the moral values upon which the country is founded. Since gaining independence, Indonesia has explicitly rejected all forms of colonialism, a stance enshrined in its 1945 Constitution. This is reinforced by the principle that colonialism must be eradicated as it contradicts humanity and justice. Critics emphasize that government actions must align with the country’s core moral values and consider global humanitarian norms.

The context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict adds complexity to the issue, as many argue that Israel’s current behavior contradicts humanitarian and ethical standards. Although the decision is economically motivated, it raises concerns among those advocating for the preservation of Indonesia’s moral heritage.

Beyond economic aspects, modern businesses consider moral principles and human rights. Global ESG standards are becoming increasingly significant, with some entities, like the Norwegian Government Pension Fund, taking steps to divest from companies associated with Israeli settlements.

The calling visa policy thus serves as a test for Indonesia, urging adherence to its principles of humanity and justice.